Skip to content
Quantix Security Labs

Smart contract vulnerabilities

A smart contract vulnerability is a gap between what the code allows and what the protocol intends. The OWASP Smart Contract Top 10 groups the classes that recur in public incident reports: missing or misconfigured access control, flawed business logic, manipulable prices, unchecked inputs and external calls, rounding errors, reentrancy and unsafe upgrade paths.

In this area

Publications
8
Reading time
67 min

Primers explain a known class of issue with illustrative code. Analyses synthesise public incidents, standards and papers, each cited.

Publications

8 publications on smart contract vulnerabilities

The publications below explain each class with simplified code, the conditions that make it exploitable and the fixes that hold, for Solidity, Solana programs and Move. The table maps every 2026 OWASP entry to the Quantix article that covers it, and says plainly where coverage is still missing.
  • Smart Contract Vulnerabilities11 min read

    Primer

    Smart contract audit checklist: readiness and security checks

    What to prepare before a smart contract audit, the checks to run for each class in the OWASP Smart Contract Top 10: 2026, what Slither, fuzzers and provers catch and miss, and what to do after the report.

  • Smart Contract Vulnerabilities11 min read

    Primer

    How to read a smart contract audit report, section by section

    What each section of an audit report establishes and what it leaves open, how to check that deployed bytecode matches the audited commit, and the questions to ask before relying on a report.

  • Smart Contract Vulnerabilities7 min read

    Primer

    Initializers, proxies and the contract nobody owns

    Upgradeable contracts move construction logic into ordinary functions. That small change creates a family of access-control failures that a constructor would never allow.

  • Smart Contract Vulnerabilities6 min read

    Primer

    Solana program security: every account is an input

    Solana programs receive their state as a list of accounts chosen by the caller. Most serious bugs come from trusting that list. The checks every instruction needs, and how Anchor helps and where it does not.

  • Smart Contract Vulnerabilities6 min read

    Primer

    The Move security model, and where it stops

    Move’s type system rules out whole classes of EVM bugs: resources cannot be copied or silently dropped. Capability leaks, generic confusion, arithmetic aborts and upgrade semantics remain. A review guide for Aptos and Sui.

OWASP mapping

OWASP Smart Contract Top 10 (2026), mapped to Quantix research

Each entry of the OWASP Smart Contract Top 10: 2026 with the publications that explain it. Entries without a dedicated Quantix article yet are marked as such; every entry links to its review checks in the audit checklist.
OWASP Smart Contract Top 10 2026 entries and the Quantix publications that cover them
EntryVulnerability classQuantix research
SC01:2026Access Control Vulnerabilities

SC01 checks in the audit checklist

SC02:2026Business Logic Vulnerabilities

SC02 checks in the audit checklist

SC03:2026Price Oracle Manipulation

SC03 checks in the audit checklist

SC04:2026Flash Loan–Facilitated Attacks

SC04 checks in the audit checklist

SC05:2026Lack of Input Validation

SC05 checks in the audit checklist

SC06:2026Unchecked External CallsNo dedicated article yet

SC06 checks in the audit checklist

SC07:2026Arithmetic Errors (Rounding and Precision)

SC07 checks in the audit checklist

SC08:2026Reentrancy Attacks

SC08 checks in the audit checklist

SC09:2026Integer Overflow and UnderflowNo dedicated article yet

SC09 checks in the audit checklist

SC10:2026Proxy and Upgradeability Vulnerabilities

SC10 checks in the audit checklist

Want this reasoning applied to your code?

Share the repository, the commit you plan to deploy and your timeline. The first output of any engagement is a written scope.