Skip to content
Quantix Security Labs

Wrenfield Privacy Pool

Shielded pool with association-set proofs.

A shielded pool where withdrawals prove membership in a deposit Merkle tree and in a chosen association set, using zero-knowledge proofs verified on-chain.

Ecosystem
ETHEthereum
Category
Privacy
Languages
Solidity, Circom
Launched
Apr 2026
73.3BBElevated risk

Grade BB · Elevated risk

Moderate risk; several areas need remediation.

+0.3 since Apr 2026 · ±0.0 since Jul 2026

Quantix Protocol Research · as of 24 Oct 2026 · About this data

Risk Index

How the score is built

Six weighted components, each scored 0–100 where higher means less risk. Points are the component value multiplied by its weight; the gap is what the component costs against a perfect score.
ComponentWeightValuePointsGap
Code Security30%7422.2−7.8
Operational Security20%7214.4−5.6
Governance Risk15%7411.1−3.9
Economic Security15%7611.4−3.6
Infrastructure Resilience10%727.2−2.8
Transparency10%707.0−3.0
Quantix Risk Index100%73.3−26.7
CodeOperationalGovernanceEconomicInfrastructureTransparencyWrenfield Privacy Pool, Code: 74Wrenfield Privacy Pool, Operational: 72Wrenfield Privacy Pool, Governance: 74Wrenfield Privacy Pool, Economic: 76Wrenfield Privacy Pool, Infrastructure: 72Wrenfield Privacy Pool, Transparency: 70
Risk Index components: Wrenfield Privacy Pool Code 74, Operational 72, Governance 74, Economic 76, Infrastructure 72, Transparency 70
ComponentWrenfield Privacy Pool
Code74
Operational72
Governance74
Economic76
Infrastructure72
Transparency70

Grade scale

  1. AAA90–100
  2. AA85–89.9
  3. A80–84.9
  4. BBB75–79.9
  5. BB70–74.9
  6. B65–69.9
  7. CCC60–64.9
  8. CC55–59.9
  9. C50–54.9
  10. D0–49.9

Score history

7 monthly snapshots

Each point is the Risk Index computed from that month’s component values. Markers below the chart show the events that moved a component; the history starts at launch in Apr 2026.
Wrenfield Privacy Pool Quantix Risk Index by month
PeriodQuantix Risk Index
Apr ’2673.0
May ’2673.0
Jun ’2673.0
Jul ’2673.3
Aug ’2673.3
Sep ’2673.3
Oct ’2673.3
  1. 20 Jul 2026

    Disclosure

    Circuit documentation published

    Constraint documentation and test vectors released.

    • Transparency+3

Risk factors

What keeps the score from being higher, most severe first.
  • HighCode SecurityProfile analysis

    Under-constrained circuit risk

    A missing constraint in membership or nullifier logic could allow double withdrawals without detection.

  • MediumTransparencyProfile analysis

    Unpublished setup transcript

    Users cannot verify that toxic waste was discarded.

Recommendations

Each recommendation raises one component to a target value. The score effect is recomputed with the Risk Index model, holding every other component fixed.
  • Code Security: 74 → 82

    Formal circuit verification

    Check constraint completeness with a formal tool and publish results.

    +2.4

    → 75.7

  • Transparency: 70 → 82

    Publish ceremony transcript

    Release contributions and verification scripts.

    +1.2

    → 74.5

Analysis

Contract, governance and operations

Contract analysis

Source
Verified
Upgradeability
Immutable pool; association-set registry upgradeable
Administrative control
Association-set curators (multisig)
Enforced delay
None identified
External dependencies
Trusted setup output; Association-set curators
  • PassVerifier contract. Groth16 verifier generated from published circuits.
  • CautionTrusted setup. Ceremony transcript not yet published.
  • CautionCircuit review. Circuits reviewed manually; no formal constraint verification.

Governance exposure

Moderate

Curators decide which deposits appear in published association sets.

Operational resilience

Adequate

Relayers submit withdrawals; curator process documented.

Monitoring

Monitoring history

1 recorded security events for Wrenfield Privacy Pool, most recent first.
  1. 5 Jan 2026InformationalAssociation set root updatedGovernance · AssociationSetsResolved

Research assessment

No Quantix assessment of Wrenfield Privacy Pool has been published. Its security findings are represented by the contract-analysis signals above: 0 failed and 2 cautionary.

Continue with

Comparable protocols

Compare side by side

Research

Relevant research

Publications on the risks that matter most for a privacy protocol.

Architecture

System components

Pool
Deposits, commitments and withdrawals
Verifier
On-chain Groth16 verification
Circuits (Circom)
Membership and nullifier constraints
AssociationSets
Published subset roots

Turn risk factors into a remediation plan.

A research assessment traces each weakness to code, configuration or process, and verifies the fix before the score moves.