Skip to content
Quantix Security Labs

Ferrous Hub

IBC routing hub with packet-forward middleware.

A Cosmos SDK chain that routes ICS-20 transfers between app-chains using packet-forward middleware, with CosmWasm contracts for swap-and-forward routes.

Ecosystem
ATOMCosmos
Category
Interoperability
Languages
Go (Cosmos SDK), Rust (CosmWasm)
Launched
Apr 2025
82.9AModerate risk

Grade A · Moderate risk

Sound posture; some improvements recommended.

+0.4 since Nov 2025 · ±0.0 since Jul 2026

Quantix Protocol Research · as of 24 Oct 2026 · About this data

Risk Index

How the score is built

Six weighted components, each scored 0–100 where higher means less risk. Points are the component value multiplied by its weight; the gap is what the component costs against a perfect score.
ComponentWeightValuePointsGap
Code Security30%8425.2−4.8
Operational Security20%8216.4−3.6
Governance Risk15%8012.0−3.0
Economic Security15%8212.3−2.7
Infrastructure Resilience10%848.4−1.6
Transparency10%868.6−1.4
Quantix Risk Index100%82.9−17.1
CodeOperationalGovernanceEconomicInfrastructureTransparencyFerrous Hub, Code: 84Ferrous Hub, Operational: 82Ferrous Hub, Governance: 80Ferrous Hub, Economic: 82Ferrous Hub, Infrastructure: 84Ferrous Hub, Transparency: 86
Risk Index components: Ferrous Hub Code 84, Operational 82, Governance 80, Economic 82, Infrastructure 84, Transparency 86
ComponentFerrous Hub
Code84
Operational82
Governance80
Economic82
Infrastructure84
Transparency86

Grade scale

  1. AAA90–100
  2. AA85–89.9
  3. A80–84.9
  4. BBB75–79.9
  5. BB70–74.9
  6. B65–69.9
  7. CCC60–64.9
  8. CC55–59.9
  9. C50–54.9
  10. D0–49.9

Score history

12 monthly snapshots

Each point is the Risk Index computed from that month’s component values. Markers below the chart show the events that moved a component.
Ferrous Hub Quantix Risk Index by month
PeriodQuantix Risk Index
Nov ’2582.5
Dec ’2582.5
Jan ’2682.9
Feb ’2682.9
Mar ’2682.9
Apr ’2682.9
May ’2682.9
Jun ’2682.9
Jul ’2682.9
Aug ’2682.9
Sep ’2682.9
Oct ’2682.9
  1. 27 Jan 2026

    Economic

    Channel rate limits

    Per-channel flow limits enabled.

    • Economic Security+3

Risk factors

What keeps the score from being higher, most severe first.
  • MediumCode SecurityProfile analysis

    Multi-hop refund handling

    Funds forwarded through several chains can be stuck if an intermediate timeout is mishandled.

  • MediumInfrastructure ResilienceProfile analysis

    Light-client expiry

    Expired clients freeze channels until governance recovers them.

Recommendations

Each recommendation raises one component to a target value. The score effect is recomputed with the Risk Index model, holding every other component fixed.
  • Code Security: 84 → 88

    Refund-path tests

    Simulate multi-hop timeouts in CI.

    +1.2

    → 84.1

  • Infrastructure Resilience: 84 → 88

    Client-expiry alerts

    Alert well before trusting periods lapse and fund backup relayers.

    +0.4

    → 83.3

Analysis

Contract, governance and operations

Contract analysis

Source
Verified
Upgradeability
Chain software upgrades through on-chain governance
Administrative control
Validator set and token governance
Enforced delay
None identified
External dependencies
IBC light clients; Relayers; Connected app-chains
  • PassRate limits. Per-channel flow limits on ICS-20 transfers.
  • CautionPacket forwarding. Refund paths on multi-hop timeouts depend on intermediate chains.
  • CautionClient expiry. Light clients can expire if relayers stop updating them.

Governance exposure

Low

Software upgrades by on-chain governance with a voting period.

Operational resilience

Strong

Multiple relayer operators; client updates monitored.

Monitoring

Monitoring history

1 recorded security events for Ferrous Hub, most recent first.
  1. 21 Sept 2026LowChannel-12 flow limit raisedConfiguration Change · Rate-limit moduleResolved

Research assessment

No Quantix assessment of Ferrous Hub has been published. Its security findings are represented by the contract-analysis signals above: 0 failed and 2 cautionary.

Continue with

Comparable protocols

Compare side by side

Research

Relevant research

Publications on the risks that matter most for a interoperability protocol.

Architecture

System components

IBC transfer stack
ICS-20 with packet forwarding
Router contract (CosmWasm)
Swap-and-forward routes
Rate-limit module
Per-channel flow limits

Turn risk factors into a remediation plan.

A research assessment traces each weakness to code, configuration or process, and verifies the fix before the score moves.